Fossil crinoids from the Jurassic


Chapter contents:

–– 1. Fossil Taxa
–– 2. Crinoidea
–– 3. Asteroidea 
–– 4. Ophiuroidea
–– 5. Echinoidea
–– 6. Holothuroidea

You can find 3D models of Crinoidea here! 

Above image: Fossil crinoids from the Jurassic by Kevin Walsh; Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license. 

Class Crinoidea Snapshot

  • Examples: sea lillies and feather stars
  • Ecology: marine filter feeders
  • Key features of group: pinnuled arms, multi-component stalk
  • Diversity: ~660 living sp., ~6,000 extinct sp.
  • Fossil record: Ordovician to Recent


Crinoids, like other members of the phylum Echinodermata, are exclusively marine animals with pentaradial symmetry and water-vascular systems. Though they share these similarities with other echinoderms, crinoids are generally considered to be the sister group (i.e., closely related but least similar) to the other major echinoderm classes (see the phylogeny below). Unique from other echinoderm classes, crinoids feed exclusively by filter feeding. To feed, crinoids use a multi-component stalk to elevate the crown (i.e., cup with vital organs, and feather-like arms) into the water column. When the stalk is present, as in a great many fossil forms, crinoids are often referred to as sea lilies—crinoid means "lily-like" in Greek. The stalk has been lost in many modern crinoids, called feather stars, as an adaptation to be more mobile than their fossil predescessors. Today, more than 660 species of living crinoid have been identified, compared to more than 6,000 species known from as far back in the fossil record as the Darriwilian Stage (467.3 - 458.4 million years ago) of Ordovician Period. In the sections that follow, we will explore the anatomy of crinoids before looking at their diversity and ecology from the Ordovician to the present.

Image of Echinodermata phylogeny, highlighting where Crinoidea sits

Highly simplified overview of Echinodermata phylogeny based in part on the hypothesis of relationships presented by Reich et al. (2015). Image by Jaleigh Q. Pier; Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license. 

Crinoid skeletal anatomy

The crinoid skeleton contains numerous elements made of magnesium-rich calcite and are held together by a combination of ligaments and muscles. Crinoids have two general components, a crown used for feeding and reproduction, and a stalk used to elevate the crown into the water column and for attachment to the ocean bottom. The crown and stalk each include two parts. The crown includes pinnuled arms, which attach at their base in a radial arrangement to the second part, the box-like cup, which contains the vital organs. The two parts of the stalk are the columnals (also called ossicles), which give the crinoid its height, and the holdfast, which is used to keep the crinoid in place. In the following sections, we will take a closer look at each of these parts.


Basic anatomy of a crinoid. Image by William I. Ausich; Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license.


Crinoid arms serve two major functions: filter feeding and locomotion. As passive suspension feeders, crinoids rely on their arms to capture tiny food particles from the water column. Each arm, which can be branched into numerous pinnules, is lined with tube feet—extensions of the water vascular system—covered in a sticky mucus. When a food particle is captured by one of the tube feet, the crinoid uses its tube feet to move the particle into an ambulacral groove. From there, the food moves to the mouth. Watch the video below to see a living crinoid filter feeding.

Watch a feather star feeding. In the close up (17s - 27s), you can see the feather star use its tube feet to catch food particles and transfer those particles to the ambulacral groove, which leads to the mouth. "VERY SPINY FEATHER STAR - 바다나리 류" by Sea School. Source: YouTube.

The second major function of crinoid arms is locomotion (watch the videos below to see the crinoids in action). Early crinoids, in the Paleozoic, did not have the capacity to move and instead cemented themselves to the place where they settled from the water column as larvae. The first stalkless crinoids, called comatulids, were found in the Late Triassic, though the evolution of locomotion occurred during the second half of the Paleozoic (see the figure on generic diversity below). Stalkless crinoids can move either by crawling along the ocean bottom or by using their arms to actively swim. When crawling, crinoids use their arms and cirri to pull themselves across the substrate and, interestingly, this behavior has also been observed in some stalked crinoids. As such, the crawling behavior may have served as an intermediary evolutionary step towards active swimming. Today—and presumably for the millions of years since the Late Triassic—many comatulid crinoids swim using alternating strokes of their arms, powered by contraction of their muscles and ligaments. It has been hypothesized that this swimming behavior may help the crinoids avoid predators and find more suitable habitat for filter feeding (learn more in the paleoecology section below).

Check out the arms and cup of this fossil monobathrid crinoid Actinocrinites gibsoni from the Carboniferous (Mississippian) Edwardsville Formation of Montgomery County, Indiana (PRI 78779). A feeding gastropod, Platyceras (Orthonychiaequilaterum, is associated with this specimen (PRI 78780). Specimen is from the research collection of the Paleontological Research Institution, Ithaca, New York. Length of crinoid is approximately 10 cm. Model by Emily Hauf.


The crinoids' arms attach at their base to the cup, which contains the vital organisms. The cup is often covered externally in small calcified plates, providing structure and protection. The topside of the cup, also referred to as the oral side (as opposed to aboral), contains both the mouth and the anus, which are connected by a U-shaped gut. Around the mouth, which is usually central in the cup, ambulacral grooves carry food from the arms using small cilia (tiny moving hairs) to transport the small food particles captured by filter feeding.

The crown of a camerate crinoid, Eucalyptocrinites caelatus, from the Silurian period of Niagara County, New York (PRI 70772). Specimen is from the collections of the Paleontological Research Institution, Ithaca, New York. Specimen is approximately 5 cm in length and represents the calyx and arms of the crinoid animal.


The first part of the stalk is the columnal, of which a crinoid typically contains many. Though the stalk has been lost in many modern comatulid crinoids (at least in their mature, adult forms), columnal components of the stalk are among the most commonly found Paleozoic fossils. These skeletal components, also called ossicles, can be found in such great abundances that they have been used as jewelry in North America, the United Kingdom, and Germany, where they were referred to as "Indian beads," "St. Cuthbert's beads," and "St. Boniface pennies," respectively. When a crinoid is alive, the columnals are connected by a long ligament; however, when the crinoid dies the ligament decays and leaves behind a hole in the center of each columnal. Because a crinoid stalk is made up of potentially hundreds of columnals, which break apart after the animal dies, they leave behind a great many fossils. The prevalence of these columnals in multiple cultures reflects the great abundances of crinoids during portions of the Paleozoic and Mesozoic. Take a closer look at columnals in the image and 3D models below. 


Devonian rock from Upstate New York with an abundance of fossil crinoid columnals. Photo by Jansen Smith.

A piece of crinoidal limestone consisting of hundreds of indvidual crinoid stem segments, from the Mississippian Keokuk Limestone of Monroe County, Indiana (PRI 76734). Specimen is from the collections of the Paleontological Research Institution, Ithaca, New York. Longest dimension of specimen is approximately 8.5 cm. Model by Emily Hauf.

Fossil specimen of an articulated series of crinoid stem segments from the Pennsylvanian of Tulsa, Oklahoma (PRI 76733). Specimen is from the collections of the Paleontological Research Institution, Ithaca, New York. Specimen is approximately 4.5 cm in length. Model by Emily Hauf.


In the living organism, the stalk is primarily a support structure used to elevate the food gathering portions of the animal into the water column. In early crinoids from the Paleozoic, an attachment region, called a holdfast, was present at the base of the stalk and was used to keep the crinoid in place.

Fossil specimen of the holdfast of the camerate crinoid Eucalyptocrinus sp. from the Silurian Waldron Shale of Shelby County, Indiana (PRI 76776). Specimen is from the collections of the Paleontological Research Institution, Ithaca, New York. Longest dimension of rock is approximately 9.5 cm.

Starting no later than the Devonian, many crinoids evolved less rigid holdfast structures, allowing for attachment on a greater variety of substrates. In some groups of more modern crinoids (e.g., isocrinids), the holdfast has been replaced by a set of cirri, which can release and regrasp the ocean bottom, allowing the crinoid to move. The cirri can also occur along the stalk in some crinoids and these are also used to grasp and attach to substrate. Because crinoids can still be found alive today, we can study living individuals to learn more about the anatomy and physiology of this group. Watch the video below to learn more about crinoids.

Learn more about crinoids from crinoid researcher Charles Messing in this video entitled, "Sea Star on a Stick: Introducing Crinoids" by Charles Messing. Source: Vimeo.

Crinoid diversity through time

The evolutionary history of crinoids and their diversity can be broken into two segments, Paleozoic and post-Paleozoic, each with its own trends and patterns. After first evolving in the Ordovician—though there is still controversy as to whether the earlier Cambrian Echmatocrinus is a true crinoid—crinoids were a prominent member of ocean bottom communities in the Paleozoic. Like many other organisms, crinoids were hard hit by the Permo-Triassic mass extinction. In a severe evolutionary bottleneck, as little as one genus survived the extinction. Post-Paleozoic crinoids eventually regained the ecological diversity of their predecessors but never recovered the morphological diversity of the Paleozoic. Once represented by more than 6,000 species, modern crinoid diversity is an order of magnitude lower, with some 660 species described. Even so, modern crinoid genus-level diversity has nearly matched Paleozoic levels as sea lilies and feather stars continue to evolve. The abundance of modern genera compared to Cenozoic diversity is likely an artefact of sampling. Whereas modern genera are identified from living organisms, the low preservability of some crinoids (e.g., stalkless comatulids) and incompleteness of the fossil record may underestimate Cenozoic crinoid diversity.


"Generic diversity of crinoids through the Phanerozoic showing the relative proportions of taxa possessing locomotory traits (red) and those lacking such traits (black). Locomotory traits include muscular arm articulations with a well-developed fulcral ridge, fulcrum-bearing cirri distributed along the length of the stalk, absence of a cementing or root-like mode of attachment: for the Paleozoic, this includes only some cladid genera, while for the Mesozoic and Cenozoic, the comatulids, isocrinids, and holocrinids. Generic data from Sepkoski (2002) and Webster (2003)." Figure and caption from Baumiller and Messing (2007) in Paleontologica Electronica; Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.

Paleozoic crinoids

Crinoids first appear in the fossil record during the Ordovician and became diverse during the Great Ordovician Biodiversity Event, which was a time when many forms of early life diversified. In the Early Ordovician, all crinoids were obligate hard-substrate taxa and they dominated nearshore, hardground environments. These crinoids, commonly belonging to the disparid (see an example in the Daedalocrinus 3D model below), camerate (see the Eucalyptocrinus two 3D models above), or cladid (see the 3D model of Stellarocrinus and Brabeocrinus below) groups, all used a cementing holdfast to attach to the hard substrate. At this early evolutionary stage, all crinoids also had relatively sparse arrays of arms, each lined with a large ambulacral groove; however, these features changed quickly as the group diversified and specialized. By the Middle Ordovician, crinoids evolved a broader set of holdfast types, allowing them to move beyond strictly hardground substrates. Concurrently, a pattern that dominated much of the Paleozoic began to develop: crinoids in higher energy, nearshore environments had more densely packed, pinnuled fans—referring collectively to a crinoid's arms—compared to crinoids in lower energy, deeper environments with more sparse, open fans.

The fossil disparid Daedalocrinus sp. from the Ordovician period (PRI 49826). Disparids such as this one were common in deeper, lower energy environments. This specimen is on public display at the Museum of the Earth, Ithaca, New York. Length of specimen is approximately 7.5 cm.

Crinoids continued to diversify in the Silurian and Devonian until reaching their maximum fossil diversity during the Early Carboniferous—this time is also called the Mississippian Period. Throughout the Middle Paleozoic, the partitioning of crinoids into high and low energy environments generally continued and species continued to diversify morphologically to maximize their fitness—or, capacity to survive and reproduce—in these environments. It is during this time that the first muscular arm articulations evolved in the cladid group, which eventually gave rise to all post-Paleozoic diversity. The evolution of muscles is notable, as these muscles contribute to crinoid flexibility and, ultimately, locomotion. In fact, the crinoid capacity to move likely evolved during the Devonian, potentially in association with the innovation of muscles.

Fossil specimens of the cladid crinoids Stellarocrinus bilineatus (PRI 49827) and Brabeocrinus christinae (PRI 76675) from the Pennsylvanian Bond Fm. of Livingston County, Illinois. Specimen is on display at the Museum of the Earth, Ithaca, New York. Longest dimension of rock is approximately 8.5 cm.

The Mississippian is often referred to as the “Age of Crinoids” because of the shear abundance of crinoids during this time. The pattern for distribution according to fan density persisted, but the highest diversity of crinoids occurred in intermediate environments where crinoids with either open or dense fans were able to filter feed efficiently. By this time, most crinoids had also evolved to use rooted or cirri attachments rather than the initial cemented holdfasts. Though the vast majority of crinoid species were not capable of movement, evolution away from cemented holdfasts enabled them to live in a wider variety of environments, regardless of the substrate. Towards the end of the Mississippian, cladids replaced camerates as the most dominant and abundant crinoids.


A comatulid crinoid, Tropiometra carinatademonstrating the use of cirri for substrate attachment. This mode of attachment is common in modern crinoids and likely began to evolve by at least the Mississippian. Photo by Seascapeza; Creative Commone Attribution-Share Alike Unported 3.0 license.

These patterns continued to hold through the Late Carboniferous—also referred to as the Pennsylvanian Period—and Permian. Crinoids with cemented holdfasts were extremely rare, as attachment via cirri proved to be advantageous. Crinoids with dense fans continued to associate with high energy environments while those with open fans remained in deeper, lower energy environments. As the Permian came to a close Crinoid diversity had already begun to decline before the decimation of the end-Permian mass extinction. Only one lineage of crinoids, the cladids, survived the mass extinction and some evidence suggests only a single genus persisted.

Post-Paleozoic crinoids

Following the Permo-Triassic mass extinction, crinoids underwent their second major evolutionary radiation. With this radiation, many crinoid species evolved the capacity for movement, including active and passive forms. Planktonic, passive forms from the Triassic included the roveacrinids and traumatocrinids, whereas active forms included crawling groups like the isocrinids and holocrinids. Mobile crinoids such as these made up as many as 90% of all crinoids by the Middle Triassic. Although there was species turnover—similar rates of extinction and origination of species—crinoids passed through the end-Triassic mass extinction with relatively little loss of diversity.


Free-living Uintacrinus socialis specimens from the Cretaceous of Kansas. These stalkless crinoids likely lived in floating colonies, making them somewhat unique in their life habit compared to other crinoids. Photograph by Jonathan R. Hendricks of specimens on display at the Denver Museum of Nature and Science.

Crinoid diversity during the Mesozoic reached its peak towards the end of the Jurassic. Despite the dominance of mobile crinoids in the Triassic, sessile (i.e., non-moving) crinoids diversified rapidly throughout the Jurassic. Though many of the sessile genera survived into the earliest Cretaceous, most of them went extinct before the Middle Cretaceous. From that point onward, mobile crinoids have dominated the crinoid fauna.


An array of Jurassic Seirocrinus and Pentacrinites (members of the Pentacrinitidae famliy) attached to a piece of driftwood. This specimen is on display at the Urwelt-Museum Hauff Holzmaden. Image by Ghedoghedo; Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.

Mesozoic crinoids never recovered the morphological diversity that they exhibited during the Paleozoic but equaled, if not exceeded, the ecological diversity of their predecessors. As discussed by Michael Foote (1999), the restriction in morphological diversity may be due to genetic constraint. That is, the crinoids that survived the Permo-Triassic extinction—potentially a single genus—did not have the genetic tool kit required to “build” the types of features found in Paleozoic crinoids. This effect, called a bottleneck, limited the variety of forms that were possible for Mesozoic crinoids.

Starting in the Mesozoic and continuing into the Cenozoic, predation on crinoids contributed substantially to the dominance of mobile genera. During the Mesozoic, escalating ecological processes led to the Mesozoic Marine Revolution, wherein predators became more powerful and more efficient. Consequently, the ability to escape predators would have been a significant advantage for mobile crinoids. Mobile crinoids remain the most dominant forms today, making up 85% of the fauna. Of the stalked crinoids that remain, none have been found naturally occurring in depths above 150 meters. The presence of more active predators in the shallower ocean, and a greater number of filter feeding competitors, has relegated these once dominant forms to the deep.


Examples of living crinoids, including an isocrinid (top left) and two comatulida (bottom left; right). Top left image from NOAA (public domain). Bottom left image from NOAA (public domain). Right image by Alexander Vasenin; Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.

Today, crinoids have regained a high level of generic diversity but, at the species level, are depauperate compared to the fossil record. More than 6,000 fossil species have been described compared to approximately 660 living species. The numerous genera of Recent crinoids compared to fossil crinoids of the Cenozoic likely reflects a bias of biological study. In observing the living organisms, it is more likely to identify greater diversity based on small differences in behavior or morphology than when considering fossil specimens. Fossils have undergone taphonomic processes, becoming compressed, fragmented, and otherwise challenging to interpret and identify. With continued study, Cenozoic crinoid diversity may increase.

Crinoid (paleo)ecology

All crinoids are filter feeders, meaning they extract their food from water as it flows past them. Unlike some other filter feeders that actively pump water past their own feeding apparatuses (e.g., some sponges, bivalves), crinoids are considered passive filter feeders because they only capture food particles and do not manipulate the flow of water as it passes them. Early crinoids, such as those dominant during much of the Paleozoic, were often cemented to a single location and unable to move. As such, it was critical for these stationary animals to be situated in a location where water currents facilitated filter feeding. Though the adult organisms were stationary, the crinoid larvae were, and still are, planktic. Considering living crinoids and other organisms with similar life habits, it is likely that the crinoid larvae were able to detect suitable locations before settling out of the water column and transitioning into their adult form. To learn more about how crinoids are studied, and particularly how studies of living crinoids are used to understand fossil crinoids, watch the video below.

Learn more about crinoids, and how they are studied, in this video, "Living Fossils - Full Episode" by ChangingSeasTV. Source: YouTube.

Water currents in the ocean are variable, which means the food supply to stationary crinoids was also variable. To cope with this variability, Paleozoic crinoids evolved slightly different body plans when living in areas with weaker (e.g., deeper water) or stronger (e.g., shallower water) currents. As discussed by Holterhoff (1997), in shallow environments, where water currents were commonly strong, crinoids were more likely to have a large calyx—the technical name for the exterior of the cup—and a dense array of arms and pinnules. To the contrary, fossil crinoids from deeper environments, where water currents were weak, had a smaller calyx and fewer arms and pinnules. As crinoids evolved the ability to move, particularly towards the end of the Paleozoic, this pattern likely broke down, as individuals could move themselves to an optimal water current for feeding.

During the Mesozoic, individuals in one family, Pentacrinitidae, utilized a particularly novel approach to achieve improved feeding capacity. Pentacrinitids, which are an extinct relative of the living isocrinids and potentially an evolutionary descendent of the earliest free-living isocrinids, attached themselves to driftwood and moved with it as it floated around the ocean. Interestingly, a group of barnacles employs a similar strategy today: they attach to whales and filter feed while the whales swim through the oceans. With this strategy, the floating pentacrinitids—and some barnacles, today—could access a broader array of food resources than individuals attached to the ocean bottom. Despite this innovation, pentacrinitids went extinct during the Eocene Epoch of the Cenozoic.


A reconstruction of Pentacrinites attached to a piece of driftwood. Image by NobuTamura; Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.

In today’s oceans, the majority of crinoids are capable of moving themselves. Some species of comatulids (i.e., feather stars) are even capable of swimming for short periods. Those that cannot swim, including some comatulids and the isocrinids, move instead by crawling along the seafloor. By being mobile, these crinoids can position themselves for more efficient filter feeding and, critically, mobility allows the crinoids to escape some of their predators, like sea urchins and sea stars.

A swimming comatulid crinoid. "Rare Moment Feather Star is Caught Swimming" by Caters Clips. Source: YouTube.

Watch as a stalked isocrinid, Neocrinus decorus, crawls away from a predatory sea star (off camera). "Crawling Crinoid" posted by gamecraziness2. Source: YouTube. Video captured by Tomasz Baumiller.

Predation on crinoids

Predation has played an important role in the diversity and distribution of crinoids in space and time. Early on, in the Ordovician and Silurian, there is very little evidence of predation on crinoids; however, from the Devonian onward, evidence of predation becomes abundant. As discussed by Tomasz Baumiller (2008), the evidence of predation can take several forms, including damaged cups and arms, evidence of arm or pinnule regeneration, and crinoid remains found in fossilized fish scat. Whereas the capacity to swim and crawl is likely an effective defensive strategy against crawling sea stars and urchins, it is less effective against more agile swimmers like fish. Crinoids have developed an additional defensive strategy, autotomy, that can be deployed against fish, sea stars, and sea urchins alike.


A selection of crinoid predators, including boarfish (Antigonia capros; left), sea stars (Pycnopodia helianthoides; middle), and sea urchins (Calocidaris micans; right). Left image by NOAA/NMFS/SEFSC Pascagoula Laboratory; Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license. Middle image by MOs810; Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license. Right image by NOAA Okeanos Explorer (public domain).

Autotomy is the intentional loss of an appendage and is a defensive strategy that has evolved independently in different branches of the tree of life. For example, some lizards will lose their tails when pursued or captured by a predator. If they are being pursued, the tail often distracts the predator, allowing the lizard to escape. Likewise, losing the tail can be an effective means for getting free from a predator’s grasp. Crinoids do not have tails to lose, but they will often drop an arm, or even their stalk, in order to avoid fatal predation.

Watch as a sea urchin consumes a feather star on the sea floor. Not even autotomy could save the feather star this time. "Sea urchin consumes a feather star crinoid" by UM News Service. Source: YouTube.

Much like the mythical hydra regrowing its heads, when a crinoid loses an arm, it grows back two fully functional arms in its place—many crinoids actually do this in order to increase their number of arms and, thereby, increase their capacity to filter feed. In addition to observing modern crinoids utilizing this anti-predatory behavior, evidence of arm loss and regeneration can be found in the fossil record, including from the Paleozoic. The proportion of individuals in a community showing evidence of autotomy can be highly variable, ranging from 0–100%, but modern and fossil frequencies tend to fall around 15–30%. Because of their autotomy behavior, predation is not fatal for crinoids in many cases.

Crinoid parasites and commensalists

In addition to antagonistic predator-prey interactions, fossil and modern crinoids interact closely with a variety of other organisms. In the Ordovician through Permian fossil record, a group of snails called platyceratids are often found attached to crinoids (see if you can find it in the 3D model below). Initially, paleontologists in the 1800s thought the crinoids were eating the platyceratid snails because the snails are often found on the top side of the cup, close to the crinoid’s mouth. 

Fossil specimen of the monobathrid crinoid Agaricocrinus americanus from the Mississippian Edwardsville Formation of Montgomery County, Indiana (PRI 70601). Also present is a small, parasitic gastropod called Palaeocapulus equilateralis. Specimen is from the collections of the Paleontological Research Institution, Ithaca, New York. Length of crinoid is approximtely 10 cm.

After examination of additional specimens, this hypothesis was rejected in favor of a new explanation: the snails were actually eating the effluent released by the crinoid (i.e., coprophagy). Given the common position of the snails near the anal opening of the crinoids, which is coincidentally located very near the mouth, this explanation portrays the relationship as a commensalism—an interaction between species where one species benefits and the other species neither benefits nor suffers. Continued study of fossil crinoid specimens, particularly studies examining cross-sections from the region where the snails attached to the crinoids, has revealed the presence of small drill holes. These holes suggest that the snails actually may have bored into the crinoid to consume nutrients straight out of the crinoid gut, and potentially the reproductive organs. That is, the snails may have been parasites. There are several species of platyceratid snail, and they are found on a variety of crinoids, leaving open the possibility for multiple types of interactions. It is clear that the snails benefitted from the interaction by gaining food; however, it remains unclear whether the interaction was always negative from the perspective of the crinoid, or merely a neutral one in some cases.

Modern crinoids, especially comatulids, are also regularly observed with other organisms—including shrimp, lobsters, worms, and fish—living on and amongst their arms. The relationships between the crinoids and these organisms is somewhat variable, ranging from parasitic (e.g., interactions with worms) to mutualisms where both organisms benefit (e.g., interactions with shrimp, lobsters, and fish). The crinoids serve as a host and, indirectly through their larger size, protect the smaller organisms from their predators. The smaller organisms also benefit by feeding on food trapped amongst the crinoids’ arms and pinnules. Through this feeding, some of the smaller “hitch hikers” clean the crinoid, which may benefit the crinoids. Watch the video below to learn more about these relationships and to see the organisms in action.

Learn more about crinoid ecology in this video on "Feather Stars and Their Animal Invaders" by Nat Geo WILD. Source: YouTube.

References and further reading:

Ausich, W. I. 1980. A model for niche differentiation in Lower Mississippian crinoid communities. Journal of Paleontology, 54: 273-288.

Ausich, W. I. 1998. Early phylogeny and subclass division of the Crinoidea (Phylum Echinodermata). Journal of Paleontology, 72: 499-510.

Baumiller, T. K. 2008. Crinoid ecological morphology. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 36: 221-249.

Baumiller, T. K., and F. J. Gahn. 2018. The nature of the platyceratid–crinoid association as revealed by cross-sectional data from the Carboniferous of Alabama (USA). Swiss Journal of Palaeontology, 137: 177-187.

Foote, M. 1999. Morphological diversity in the evolutionary radiation of Paleozoic and post-Paleozoic crinoids. Paleobiology, 25: 1-115.

Gorzelak, P., M. A. Salamon, D. Trzęsiok, R. Lach, and T. K. Baumiller. 2016. Diversity dynamics of post‐Palaeozoic crinoids–in quest of the factors affecting crinoid macroevolution. Lethaia, 49: 231-244.

Hess, H., W. I. Ausich, C. E. Brett, and M. J. Simms. 2002. Fossil crinoids. Cambridge University Press, New York, New York, 300 pp.

Holterhoff, P. F. (1997). Paleocommunity and evolutionary ecology of Paleozoic crinoids. The Paleontological Society Papers, 3: 69-106.

Wright, D. F., W. I. Ausich, S. R. Cole, M. E. Peter, and E. C. Rhenberg. 2017. Phylogenetic taxonomy and classification of the Crinoidea (Echinodermata). Journal of Paleontology, 91: 829-846.


Unless otherwise indicated, the written and visual content on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License. This page was written by Jansen A. Smith. See captions of individual images for attributions. See original source material for licenses associated with video and/or 3D model content.

Creative Commons License