8-Panel figure showing images of the 8 major groups of angiosperms. See feature image caption for more details.

Overview of Angiosperm Phylogeny

Feature image. Examples of members of the major groups of angiosperms (flowering plants) discussed on this page. Top row, left to right: Amborella trichopoda branch with leaves and flowers (ANA-grade, Amborellales); forked fanwort flower (Cabomba furcata, ANA-grade, Nymphaeales); Austrobaileya scandens flower (ANA-grade, Austrobaileyales); Sarcandra flowers and leaves (Chloranthales). Bottom row, left to right: Japanese spicebush fruits (Lindera triloba, Magnoliids); turquoise puya flower (Puya berteroniana, monocots); hornwort leaves (Ceratophyllum demersum, Ceratophyllales); frangipani flowers (Plumeria rubra, eudicots).

Credits: Amborella trichopoda (Mike Bayly, via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0); forked fanwort/Cabomba furcata (Bernard DuPont, via flickr, CC BY-SA 2.0); Austrobaileya scandens (Plant Image Library, via flickr, CC BY-SA 2.0); Sarcandra (Aparajita Datta, via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0); Lindera triloba fruits (Alpsdake, via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0); Puya berteroana (Wendy Cutler, via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 2.0); Ceratophyllum demersum (Stefan.Iefnaer, via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0); Plumeria rubra (SAplants, via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0).


In 1998, a group of botanical researchers who called themselves the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (APG) proposed their first classification for angiosperms based on the results of molecular phylogenetic analyses (i.e., analyses of molecular sequence data used to build trees of relationships among living angiosperms; see here). They used a consensus tree of angiosperm relationships to provide a framework for their classification. The APG system is focused on the circumscriptions of families, orders, and higher level clades within the angiosperms. The APG classification system has since undergone three revisions, with the most recent (APG IV) published in 2016. APG IV is followed for angiosperm classification throughout this chapter, unless otherwise noted. The APG IV system does not incorporate completely extinct groups, such as the proposed angiosperm family Archaefructaceae, which includes the fossil genus Archaefructus from the Early Cretaceous of China (see here). Nevertheless, the APG IV classification adequately covers enough angiosperm diversity in the fossil record that its use is not a major impediment for paleobotanists.

Angiosperms include over 295,000 living species of plants. Although division of the angiosperm tree into clades for the purposes of classification is somewhat arbitrary, roughly eight major groups can be recognized under the APG IV scheme. Two of these, the monocots and eudicots, represent the vast majority of living angiosperm species. While the others are relatively small groups, some of them are well represented in the fossil record and important in the early history of angiosperm evolution. An overview of the eight groups is provided below; for a more detailed phylogeny and classification scheme, see the bottom of this page.

Tree of angiosperm relationships under the APG IV system, 2016.

Overview of extant angiosperm relationships based on APG IV. Selected synapomorphies have been mapped on the tree. Credit: Illustration by E.J. Hermsen (DEAL).

ANA grade: Basally diverging groups

The name "ANA grade" is used to collectively refer to the three basally-diverging groups of angiosperms: Amborellales (A), Nymphaeales (N), and Austrobaileyales (A). These groups represent a very small proportion of extant angiosperm diversity, although Nymphaeales and Austrobaileyales are represented in the fossil record beginning in the Cretaceous period. Living ANA-grade angiosperms are significant for helping us to understand some aspects of angiosperm evolution; for example, our understanding of the evolution of the angiosperm megagametophyte (female gametophyte, also called an embryo sac), is based on the study of megagametophytes in members of Nymphaeales and Austrobaileyales (read more here).

3-Panel figure showing ANA-grade plants. Panel 1: Amborella. Panel 2: Water lilies. Panel 3: Florida anise tree.

Examples of ANA-grade angiosperms. Left. Amborella trichopoda, Amborellaceae, Amborellales. Center. Water lily (Nymphaea), Nymphaeaceae, Nymphaeales. Right. Florida anise tree (Illicium floridanum), Schisandraceae, Austrobaileyales. Credits: Amborella trichopoda (Scott Zona, Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-NC 2.0); Nymphaea (E.J. Hermsen & J.R. Hendricks, DEAL); Illicium floridanum (Scott Zona, Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-NC 2.0). Images modified from originals.


Amborella is a monotypic genus of living plants, which means that it includes only one species: Amborella trichopoda. Amborella trichopoda is also the only species in Amborellaceae and Amborellales. Amborella is native to Grande Terre, New Caledonia, an island located in the Pacific Ocean to the east of Australia. Amborella has been of significant interest to botanists ever since it was widely recognized as sister to all other living angiosperms in the early 21st century on the basis of molecular phylogenetic studies (discussed here and here).

Amborella is a dioecious (Greek, di- + oikos = two houses, meaning plants produce only pollen or ovules) shrub bearing small, unisexual flowers. It retains some apparently ancestral characteristics such as the absence of vessel elements, a type of water-conducting cell characteristic of most angiosperms. Despite this, it does not follow that Amborella generally retains "primitive" or ancestral features, nor that it accurately represents the structure of the earliest angiosperms. (In fact, it has its own unique embryo sac type that is evolved from a simpler ancestral type; see here). Amborella is rather the only living descendent of a lineage that can be traced back to a very ancient divergence in the angiosperm clade, and it is the product of over 100 million years of independent evolution following that divergence. No fossils can be attributed to Amborellales with certainty.

2-Panel figure of Amborella flowers. Panel 1: A female flower. Panel 2: Male flowers.

Amborella flowers. Left: Carpellate (female, ovule-producing) flower; carpellate flowers of Amborella have staminodes (sterile stamens). Right: Staminate (male, pollen-producing) flowers. Credits: Amborella trichopoda carpellate flower (Sangtae Kim/Penn State, via flickr, CC BY-NC 2.0); Amborella trichopoda staminate flowers (Scott Zona, via flickr, CC BY-NC 2.0). Images modified from originals.


Nymphaeales include three families, Hydatellaceae, Cambombaceae, and Nymphaeaceae (water lilies); the order has 8 living genera and nearly 90 living species. Nymphaeales are rhizomatous, aquatic, freshwater plants that are today found nearly worldwide. Their rich fossil record includes material linked to Cabombaceae and Nymphaeaceae, with the earliest reports being from the Early Cretaceous (for examples, see here and here). Hydatellaceae (1 genus, Hydatella) have inconspicuous, structurally unusual flowers, and no fossils can be unequivocally assigned to the family (see here).

A fossil water lily leaf from the Miocene of France.

Fossil water lily (Nymphaea) leaf. Leaf of Nymphaea nalinii (Miocene, France). Credit: Nymphaea nalini MNHN 12849 (Jocelyn Falconnet, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, via GBIF, CC BY 4.0).


Austrobaileyales include the families Austrobaileyaceae (Austrobaileya), Schisandraceae (Illicium, Kadsura, and Schisandra), and Trimeniaceae (Trimenia). The order has fewer than 100 species of trees, shrubs, and lianas (woody vines). Austrobaileya and Trimenia are found primarily in Oceania today, whereas Schisandraceae are distributed in eastern North America, the Caribbean, Mexico, Sri Lanka, and eastern to southeastern Asia. Austrobaileyales have a limited fossil record extending to the Early Cretaceous (for example, see here). The most well known member of this group may be the star anise (Illicium verum), which is widely used in Asia as a spice. (It is unrelated to true anise, Pimpinella anisum, a eudicot.)

2-Panel figure showing longitudinal sections of seeds. Panel 1: Trimenia-like fossil seed. Panel 2: Trimenia seed.

Seeds of fossil and modern Trimeniaceae. Left: Longitudinal section of a fossil Stopesia alveolata seed (Lower Cretaceous, Hikagenosawa Formation, Hokkaido, Japan). Right: Longitudinal section of a modern Trimenia moorei seed. Labels: em = embryo; es, ps = endosperm, perisperm (stored food); et, mt = exotesta & mesotesta (layers of seedcoat); i= inner integument; n = nucellus. Scale bars = 0.5 mm. Credit: From Figure 2 in Yamada et al. (2008) BMC Evolutionary Biology (CC BY 2.0). Image modified from original.


Chloranthaceae, the only family within the order Chloranthales, includes four living genera and over 70 living species. In some trees depicting relationships amongst angiosperms, this group is resolved as sister to the magnoliids, although this relationship was not recognized in APG IV. Chloranthaceae are distributed in the subtropics to tropics of the Americas, Madagascar, and Asia to southeastern Asia and Pacific islands. Plants in the family can be characterized by, among other attributes, their opposite leaves and small and sessile (stalkless) flowers. Although Chloranthaceae are not terribly diverse today, the family has a significant fossil record beginning in the Early Cretaceous, including macrofossils and pollen (for example, see here).

2-Panel figure. Panel 1: Japanese chloranthus with leaves and flowers. Panel 2: Fruits of Sarcandra.

Examples of plants in Chloranthaceae. Left: Japanese chlorathus (Chloranthus japonicus). Right: Fruits of Sarcandra glabra. Image credits: Chloranthus japonicus (Alpsdake, Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0); Sarcandra glabra (Batholith, Wikimedia Commons, Public Domain). Images modified from originals.

2-Panel figure of fossil Chloranthaceae. Panel 1: Stamens. Panel 2: A pollen grain showing the 4-armed aperture.

Fossil Chloranthaceae. Scanning electron micrographs (SEM images) of Early Cretaceous (Vale de Água locality, Portugal) fossil Chloranthaceae similar to the modern genus Hedyosmum. Left: Staminate structure (group of stamens). Right: Pollen grain from staminate structure (Asteropollis-type pollen), showing tetrachotomosulcate aperture (i.e., a 4-lobed aperture located on the pole). Credit: From figure 3 in Friis et al. (2019) Int J Plant Sci 180: 232–239 (CC BY-NC 4.0). Image modified from original.


The magnoliids encompass over 10,000 living species divided amongst four orders: Canellales (2 families, 10 genera), Laurales (7 families, 86 genera), Magnoliales (6 families, 131 genera), and Piperales (3 families, 16 genera). Magnoliids are an eclectic group. From an economic and cultural perspective, some magnoliids are familiar because they are used to make spices due to the presence of ethereal (volatile) oils in their tissues; others produce edible fruits; and some are grown as ornamentals. Selected examples of plants or plant products from this group include:

  • Laurales: avocado (Persea americana, fruit), bay leaf (Laurus nobilis, herb), cinnamon (several Cinnamomum species, spice), camphor (Cinnamomum camphora, medicinal scent), custard apple and soursop (several Annona species, fruit), pawpaw (Asimina triloba, fruit).
  • Magnoliales: mace and nutmeg (Myristica fragrans, spice), magnolia (Magnolia spp., ornamental), tulip tree (Liriodendron tulipfera, ornamental, wood), ylang-ylang (Cananga odorata, fragrance).
  • Piperales: black pepper (Piper nigrum, spice), kava (Piper methysticum, herbal supplement).

3-Panel figure showing magnoliids. Panel 1: Sweetshrub flower. Panel 2: Tulip tree flower. Panel 3: Leaf of kava.

Examples of Magnoliids. Left. Sweetshrub (Calycanthus), Laurales. Center. Tulip tree (Liriodendron tulipfera), Magnoliales. Right. Kava (Piper methysticum), Piperales. Credit: All images by E.J. Hermsen (DEAL).

Some magnoliids have historically been of interest to botanists due to the presence of characteristics interpreted as primitive in flowering plants. For example, members of Winteraceae (Canellales) have vesselless wood, or wood lacking the vessel elements found in the wood of most angiosperms. In the magnolia family (Magnoliaceae, Magnoliales), flowers have many helically arranged stamens and pistils on an elongated receptacle. In some Magnoliales, stamens are laminar (leaf-like). In Degeneria (Degeneriaceae, Magnoliales) and Drimys (Winteraceae), the carpels are conduplicate (folded) and not completely sealed where their edges meet.

2-Panel figure showing magnoliid flower structure. Panel 1: Flowers of canelo. Panel 2: Section through a Degeneria carpel showing where where the region where the unsealed edges meet.

Magnoliids with supposedly primitive flowers. Left: Canelo (Drimys winteri, Canellales), showing central carpels (green structures) surrounded by stamens (yellow structures) and petals (white structures). Right. Section of a carpel of Degeneria (Magnoliales); the edges of the carpel are not fused where they come together (arrow), but are filled with trichomes (hairs). Credits: Canelo/Drimys winteri flowers (Scott Zona, via flickr, CC BY-NC 2.0); Degeneria vitiensis carpel, fig. 91 from Swamy (1949) J Arnold Arbor 30: 10–38 (via Biodiversity Heritage Library, CC BY-NC-SA 3.0). Images modified from originals.

As discussed for Amborella, the idea that some magnoliids have primitive features that provide keys to the early evolution of flowering plants should be treated with caution. Research has indicated, for example, that vesselless wood in Winteraceae may be an adaptation to life in environments that experience freezing temperatures (see here); along with the phylogenetic position of Winteraceae among magnoliid families with vessels, this research suggests that loss of vessels is actually an apomorphy (more recent modification) in Winteraceae rather than a plesiomorphy (characteristic retained from flowering plant ancestors).

The fossil record of magnoliids begins in the Early Cretaceous. A noteworthy extinct member of Magnoliales is Archaeanthus, an early Late Cretaceous plant known from fruits and associated leaves that is similar to the modern magnolia (Magnolia) and tulip tree (Liriodendron) (see here).

Drawings showing reconstructions of Archaeanthus, an extinct Magnolia-like plant, in flower and in fruit.

Reconstructions of the Archaeanthus plant. Left: Reconstruction of the Archaeanthus linnenbergeri plant in flower. Right: Reconstruction of the Archaeanthus linnenbergeri plant in fruit. Credits: Reconstructions of the Archaeanthus linnenbergeri plant based on fossils from the Cenomanian (lowermost Upper Cretaceous) Dakota Formation (Kansas, U.S.A.) by Megan Rohn (figs. 69–70 in Dilcher & Crane, 1984, Ann Missouri Bot Gard 71: 351–383, via Biodiversity Heritage Library, CC BY-NC-SA 3.0). Images modified from originals.


Moncots are the second largest major clade of angiosperms, after the eudicots, with 11 orders and over 70,000 species. The name monocot is short for "monocotyledon" (Greek, monos = one), a synapomorphy for the group. "Monocotyledon" indicates that the embryo in members of this group has a single cotyledon, or seed leaf. Some additional features typical of monocots are having floral parts in multiples of three, an atactostele in the stem (vascular bundles occur throughout the stem when it is viewed in cross section), and parallel leaf venation. Monocots lack the bifacial vascular cambium that produces wood in many other seed plants, so monocot trees (like palms) must achieve a large circumference through various other methods of growth.

2-Panel figure. Panel 1: Mariposa lily flower showing floral parts in multiples of three. Panel 2: Cross section of a corn stem showing scattered vascular bundles.

Monocot characteristics. Left: Flower of winding mariposa lily (Calochortus flexuosus) showing floral parts in multiples of three: 3 sepals (not visible), 3 petals, 6 stamens, 3 carpels (indicated by 3 stigma lobes). Right: Cross section of a corn (Zea mays) stem showing an atactostele with scattered vascular bundles (the structures that look like dots or little faces). Credits: Calochortus flexuosus 12 (Stan Shebs, via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0); Zea mays stem (Jon Houseman and Matthew Ford, via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0). Images modified from originals.

By far the largest family of monocots, and the largest family of angiosperms overall, is the Orchidaceae (orchids), which includes an estimated 28,000 living species in over 730 genera. The second largest family of monocots is the grass family (Poaceae), with about 12,000 living species in 780 genera. Grasses are the most economically important monocots; cereals such as rice (Oryza), wheat (Triticum), and corn (Zea mays) make up an significant part of the human diet. Examples of other large or notable families of monocots include the arums (Araceae), bromeliads (Bromeliaceae, the group that pineapple is in), gingers (Zingiberaceae), bananas and plantains (Musaceae), lilies (Liliaceae), palms (Arecaceae), and sedges (Cyperaceae).

3-Panel figure showing examples of monocots. Panel 1: An orchid. Panel 2: A grass. Panel 3: Palm trees.

Examples of monocots. Left: Ram's head lady slipper (Cyprepedium arietinum), orchid family (Orchidaceae). Center: Rattlesnake grass (Briza), grass family (Poaceae). Right: Mexican fan palm (Washingtonia robusta), palm family (Arecaceae).  Image credits: Cyprepedium arietinum (James Ellison, Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 2.0); Briza (Alvesgaspar, Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0); Washingtonia robusta (Geographer, Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0). Images modified from originals.

The fossil record of monocots begins in the Early Cretaceous (for example, see here). The quality of the fossil records of monocot orders and familes does not neatly correlate to their present diversity. Orchids are herbaceous (non-woody), are often epiphytes (plants that grow on other plants, from the Greek epi + phyton = upon plant), and have specialized modes of insect pollination that often involve transferring pollen in clumps. Thus, their preservation potential in both the macrofossil and fossil pollen records is low. Orchids have a paltry fossil record with only a few credible occurrences. One interesting way that fossil orchids are preserved is as pollen masses (pollinia) and associated structures stuck to insects trapped in amber (for example, see here).

The richest monocot macrofossil record may belong to the palms (Arecaceae), which arose in the Cretaceous and today include about 180 genera and 2,600 species. Palms have durable tissues in their stems, leaves, and fruits, which increases their potential for preservation. Other monocots that are well represented in the macrofossil record are those that live in wetland or aquatic habitats, like pondweeds (Potomogetonaceae), aquatic arums (Araceae), and cattails (Typhaceae). Fossil monocots are also known from dispersed pollen grains and phytoliths (Greek, phyton + lithos = plant stone), characteristic silica bodies that occur in plant tissues. Pollen and phytoliths are particularly important for the study of grasses, which have a relatively poor macrofossil record.

Slab of fossil palm "wood." Transverse section of a portion of a fossil palm stem (Palmoxylon cheyennense, Cretaceous, Pierre Shale, South Dakota, U.S.A.). Note that palms and other "woody" monocots do not produce true wood. The dots in the palm stem are vascular bundles with associated bundle caps made up of fibers (compare to the cross section of the corn stem shown above). Credit: Model by Emily Hauf (Digital Atlas of Ancient Life, via Sketchfab, CC BY-SA 4.0).

Fossil cattail leaves showing parallel arrangement of major veins from the Miocene of France.

Fossil cattail (Typha) leaves. The fossil leaves of a cattail (Typha latissima, Miocene, France) show the parallel pattern of major veins characteristic of many monocots. Credit: Typha latissima MNHN 12689 (Jocelyn Falconnet, via GBIF, CC BY 4.0).


2-Panel figure of Ceratophyllum, or hornwort, an aquatic plant. Panel 1: Hornworts growing in water. Panel 2: Detail of a shoot with leaves and staminate flowers.

Hornwort (Ceratophyllum). Left: Hornwort (Ceratophyllum demersum) growing in water. Right: Detail of hornwort (Certatophyllum demersum) showing leaves and staminate inflorescences. Image credits: Left (Radio Tonreg, Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 2.0); right (Christian Fischer, Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0). Images modified from originals.

Ceratophyllum, commonly called hornwort, is the only extant genus in the family Ceratophyllaceae and the order Ceratophyllales; it has four living species. Ceratophyllum is a freshwater aquatic plant that occurs worldwide. It lacks roots and has dissected leaves. Ceratophyllales have a fossil record that may extend to the Early Cretaceous (see here).

Note: Another group of plants commonly called hornworts are placed in the phylum Anthocerotophyta. The hornworts in Anthocerotophyta are bryophytes (nonvascular plants) that are not related to Ceratophyllum. This is yet another example where scientific nomenclature is useful!

Photo of fossil Ceratophyllum with characteristic dissected leaves. Oligocene, France.

Fossil CeratophyllumFossil of Ceratophyllum aquitanicum (Oligocene, France). Credit: Ceratophyllum aquitanicum MNHN 28579 (Jocelyn Falconnet, MNHN-Museum national d'Histoire naturelle, via GBIF, CC BY 4.0). Image modified from original.


The eudicots are by far the largest group of angiosperms. They include over 210,000 species of plants in 44 orders. The term "dicot," short for "dicotyledon," refers to angiosperms that have embryos with two cotyledons, or seed leaves (Greek di- = two). Usage of the term harkens back to an older way of classifying angiosperms, where the angiosperms were split into two major groups: the dicots and the monocots. While the monocots (discussed above) are monophyletic, the dicots as traditionally understood are paraphyletic. In fact, having embryos with two cotyledons is the ancestral (plesiomorphic) condition in angiosperms, as well as in seed plants; cycads, Ginkgo, and gnetophytes all have two cotyledons (the numbers of cotyledons in conifers varies).

The name eudicot, or "true dicot" (Greek eu = good/true), distinguishes the monophyletic eudicot group that includes most dicotyledonous angiosperms from the outdated dicot concept. Eudicots are less commonly called tricolpates because the synapomorphy that defines the group is the production of tricolpate pollen. Such pollen has three elongated or slit-like apertures on its sides. The apertures are thin areas in the pollen wall through which the pollen grain germinates.

2-Panel figure of tricolpate pollen grains of Arabis (rockcress). Panel 1: Polar view in which 3 apertures are visible. Panel 2: Equatorial (lateral) view showing one slit-like aperture.

Tricolpate pollen. These scanning electron microscope images come from pollen of rockcress (Arabis), a plant in the mustard family (Brassicaceae). Left: Pollen grain in polar view showing all three apertures (arrows). Right: Pollen grain in equatorial view showing a single aperture. Image credits: Polar view and equatorial view (Maria Majaura, via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0). Images modified form originals.

Eudicots are often contrasted with monocots based on their vegetative and floral features. Most eudicot characteristics highlighted in such comparisons are ancestral or plesiomorphic within angiosperms (for example, two cotyledons, eustele). One exception is the presence of tricolpate pollen discussed above; monosulcate pollen, the monocot condition, is ancestral (plesiomorphic) within angiosperms. Additionally, floral parts of eudicots are often in multiples of four or five. Flowers with five parts per whorl are a synapomorphy for the Pentapetalae, a large clade that includes most eudicots (= Superrosids + Superasterids; see the diagram at the bottom of this page). Floral parts in multiples of three, typical of monocots, might be the ancestral angiosperm condition (see here).

Monocot vs. Eudicot Characteristics1

Number of cotyledonsOneTwo
Flower partsUsually in 3’s Usually in 4’s or 5’s
Number & position of pollen aperturesMonosulcate (one polar aperture)Tricolpate (three lateral apertures)
Leaf venationUsually parallelUsually reticulate (net-like)
Vascular bundles in stemAtactostele (scattered)Eustele (in a ring)
RootPith presentPith absent
Root systemFibrous (adventitious roots)Taproot (develops from radicle/embryonic root) with branch roots
Bifacial vascular cambiumAbsentPresent in many

1Note that these characteristics are generalizations, and individual species may deviate in one or more features. Table modified & expanded after table 19-1 in Evert & Eichhorn (2013), Raven Biology of Plants.

2-Panel figure. Panel 1: Pink woodsorrel flowers showing 5 petals, 10 stamens, and 5 stigmas. Panel 2: Cross-section of clover stem showing a single ring of vascular bundles.

Eudicot characteristics. Left: Flowers of pink woodsorrel (Oxalis debilis), showing 5-parted floral whorls; flowers have 5 sepals (not visible), 5 petals, 10 stamens, and 5 carpels (indicated by 5 stigmas). Right: Cross-section of a clover (Trifolium) stem showing a eustele (vascular bundles in a ring; one bundle is circled). Credits: Oxalis debilis (Alvesgaspar, via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0); young Trifolium stem cross-section (Berkshire Community College Bioscience Image Library, via flickr, CC 0 1.0/Public Domain).

2-Panel figure showing fossil eudicots. Panel 1: 5-parted calyx of Florissantia. Panel 2: Fossil leaf of Langeria showing pinnate venation.

Eudicot fossils. Left: Five-parted calyx of a fossil member of the mallow family (Florissantia quichenensis, Malvaceae); size = 2.9 cm in diameter. Right: Leaf of a fossil member of the witch hazel family (Langeria magnifica, Hamamelidaceae) showing pinnate venation pattern with a midrib and large lateral veins (pinnate = feather-like); minor veins form a net-like reticulum. Both fossils are from the Ypresian/lower Eocene Republic flora, Klondike Mountain Formation, Washington, U.S.A. Credits: Florissantia quichenensis (Kevmin, via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0); Langeria magnifica (Kevmin, via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0). Images modified from originals.

Eudicots include five basally-diverging orders (Ranunculales, Proteales, Trochodendrales, Buxales, and Gunnerales) and two major clades: the Superrosids (19 orders) and Superasterids (20 orders). The diversity of eudicots is so great that the group is difficult to summarize. Three large families account for over a quarter (>25%) of living eudicot species. These include:

  • Asteraceae: Asteraceae (aster, daisy, or sunflower family) include over 1,600 living genera and an estimated 24,700 living species. Examples are daisies (plants in multiple genera), chrysanthemums (Chrysanthemum), goldenrods (Solidago), sunflowers (Helianthus), and zinnias (Zinnia).
  • Fabaceae: The legume family, Fabaceae, includes about 750 living genera and 19,500 living species. Examples are beans (multiple genera), lupines (Lupinus), peanut (Arachis hypogea), peas (multiple genera), soybean (Glycine max), and tamarind (Tamarindus indica).
  • Rubiaceae: Rubiaceae (bedstraw, coffee, or madder family) have about 590 living genera and over 13,600 living species. The most familiar member of this family is, obviously, coffee (Coffea). Gardenia (Gardenia) is grown as an ornamental.

3-Panel figure showing eudicots. Panel 1: Sunflower, aster family. Panel 2: Jade vine, legume family. Panel 3: Bluets, coffee family.

Examples of eudicots. Left: A sunflower (Helianthus), aster family (Asteraceae). Center: Jade vine (Strongylodon macrobotrys), legume family (Fabaceae). Right: Bluets (Houstonia), coffee family (Rubiaceae).  Image credits: Sunflower (Helianthus) and bluets (Houstonia) by E.J. Hermsen (DEAL); jade vine (Strongylodon) by J.R. Hendricks (DEAL).

Examples of other types of eudicots include birches (Betula), buttercups (Ranunculus), cacti (Cactaceae), grapes (Vitis), gourds (Cucurbitaceae), mustards (Brassicaceae), nightshades (Solanaceae), oaks (Quercus), roses (Rosa), and willows (Salix). Cotton (Gossypium), apples (Malus), citrus fruits (Citrus), olive (Olea europaea), tea (Camellia sinensis), tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum), and cannabis (Cannabis) are eudicots.

As in other major angiosperm groups, the earliest evidence for eudicots appears in the Early Cretaceous; it consists of dispersed, tricolpate pollen grains (reviewed here). Early Cretaceous macrofossil remains of eudicots are also known (for example, see here and here). The eudicots diversified rapidly, and plants related to modern families and genera are recognizable in the Late Cretaceous.

As in the monocots, the present diversity of eudicot groups does not necessarily correlate to their representation in the fossil record. For example, the family Platanaceae (plane-tree family) includes one living genus (Platanus, sycamores and plane trees) with about 8 living species. However, the family has a good fossil record beginning in the Early Cretaceous (partially reviewed here) that includes extinct genera like Paleogene taxon Macginitea. The quality of the fossil record may be due to the structural features of plane-trees, like robust leaves and dry fruits. In contrast, Asteraceae (the aster family), the largest extant eudicot family by number of species, are known from pollen but are poorly represented in the macrofossil record (reviewed here and here).

2-Panel figure. Panel 1: Palmately-lobed leaf of Macginitea. Panel 2: Fruit of Macginicarpa.

Fossil sycamores (Plantanaceae). Left: Macginitea wyomingensis leaf (Bonanza locality, Eocene, Parachute Creek Member of the Green River Formation, Utah, U.S.A.). Right: Macginicarpa manchesteri fruit; fruit type = multiple of achenes (near Red Deer River, Paleocene, Paskapoo Formation, Alberta, Canada). Credits: Macginitea wyomingensis, YPM PB 168143 (Division of Paleobotany, Yale Peabody Museum, via GBIF, CC0 1.0/Public Domain); Fossil Platanus fruit (=Macginicarpon manchesteri; Georgialh, via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0). Images modified from originals.

Overview of angiosperm phylogeny

The image below provides a detailed overview of angiosperm phylogeny and classification down to the ordinal level. Families included in each order are listed on the right.

Poster showing tree of angiosperm relationships and classification. See the citation in the figure caption for a downloadable PDF version.

Angiosperm phylogeny and classification. The diagram above provides an overview of extant angiosperm phylogeny and classification based on APG IV and other sources. Credit: Cole et al. (2019) PeerJ Preprints 7: e2320v6 (CC BY 4.0). This image was modified (resized, file format changed). For a full-sized PDF, consult the original.

Selected references

Note: Free full text is made available by the publisher for items marked with a green asterisk.

Academic articles & book chapters

Angiosperm Phylogeny Group. 1998. An ordinal classification for the families of flowering plants. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 85: 531–553. Read/download free at Biodiversity Heritage Library: https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/part/2234#/summary. Read free on JSTOR (account sign-up or institutional access required): https://doi.org/10.2307/2992015

Angiosperm Phylogeny Group. 2003. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 141: 399–436. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1095-8339.2003.t01-1-00158.x

Angiosperm Phylogeny Group. 2009. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 161: 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2009.00996.x

Angiosperm Phylogeny Group, M.W. Chase, M.J.M. Christenhusz, M.F. Fay, J.W. Byng, W.S. Judd, D.E. Soltis, D.J. Mabberley, A.N. Sennikov, P.S. Soltis, and P.F. Stevens. 2016. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 181: 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/boj.12385

Christenhusz, M.J.M., and J.W. Byng. 2016. The number of known plants species in the world and its annual increase. Phytotaxa 261: 201–217. http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.261.3.1

Coiffard, C., N. Kardjilov, I. Manke, and M.E.C. Bernardes-de-Oliveira. 2019. Fossil evidence of core monocots in the Early Cretaceous. Nature Plants 5: 691–696. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-019-0468-y

Coiffard, C., B.A.R. Mohr, and M.E.C. Bernardes-de-Oliveira. Jaguariba wiersemana gen. nov. et sp. nov., an Early Cretaceous member of crown group Nymphaeales (Nymphaeaceae) from northern Gondwana. Taxon 62: 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.621012

Dilcher, D.L., and P.R. Crane. 1984. Archaeanthus: An early angiosperm from the Cenomanian of the Western Interior of North America. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 71: 351–383. Read/download for free from Biodiversity Heritage Library: https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/part/3952#/summary. Read free on JSTOR (account sign-up or institutional access required): https://doi.org/10.2307/2399030.

Doyle, J.A. 2013. Phylogenetic analyses and morphological innovations in land plants. In: B.A. Ambrose and M. Purugganan, eds. The evolution of plant form. Annual Plant Reviews 45: 1–50. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118305881

Feild, T.S., T. Brodribb, and N.M. Holbrook. 2007. Hardly a relict: Freezing and the evolution of vesselless wood in Winteraceae. Evolution 56: 464–478. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb01359.x

Friis, E.M., P.R. Crane, and K.R. Pedersen. 2019. Hedyosmum-like fossils in the Early Cretaceous diversification of angiosperms. International Journal of Plant Sciences 180: 232–239. https://doi.org/10.1086/701819

* Friis, E.M., M.M. Mendes, and K.R. Pedersen. 2017. Paisia, an Early Cretaceous eudicot angiosperm flower with pantoporate pollen from Portugal. Grana 57: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00173134.2017.1310292

Kvaček, Z., S.R. Manchester, and S.-x. Guo. 2001. Trifoliate leaves of Platanus bella (Heer) comb. n. from the Paleocene of North America, Greenland, and Asia and their relationships among extinct and extant Platanaceae. International Journal of Plant Sciences 162: 441–458. https://doi.org/10.1086/319574

Manchester, S.R., F. Grímsson, and R. Zetter. 2015. Assessing the fossil record of Asterids in the context of our current phylogenetic framework. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 100: 329–363. https://doi.org/10.3417/2014033. Read free on PubMed Central, PMC ID PMC6485501

Martínez-Millán, M. 2010. Fossil record and age of the Asteridae. The Botanical Review 76: 83–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12229-010-9040-1

Mohr, B.A.R., M.E.C. Bernardes-de-Oliveira, and D.W. Taylor. 2008. Pluricarpellatia, a nymphaealean angiosperm from the Lower Cretaceous of northern Gondwana (Crato Formation, Brazil). Taxon 57: 1147–1158. https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.574009

Pigg, K.B., and R.A. Stockey. 1991. Platanaceous plants from the Paleocene of Alberta, Canada. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 70: 125–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-6667(91)90082-E

Poinar, G., Jr., Rasmussen, F.N. 2017. Orchids from the past, with a new species in Baltic amber. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 183: 327–333. https://doi.org/10.1093/botlinnean/bow018

Punt, W., P.P. Hoen, S. Blackmore, S. Nilsson, and A. Le Thomas. 2007. Glossary of pollen and spore terminology. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 143: 1–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2006.06.008

Rudall, P.J., D.D. Sokoloff, M.V. Remizowa, J.G. Conran, J.I. Davis, T.D. Macfarlane, and D.W. Stevenson. 2007. Morphology of Hydatellaceae, an anomolous aquatic family recently recognized as an early-divergent angiosperm lineage. American Journal of Botany 94: 1073–1092. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.94.7.1073

Sauquet, H., M. von Balthazar, S. Magallón, J.A. Doyle, P.K. Endress, E.J. Bailes, E. Barroso de Morais, K. Bull-Hereñu, L. Carrive, M. Chartier, G. Chomicki, M. Coiro, R. Cornette, J.H. L. El Ottra, C. Epicoco, C.S.P. Foster, F. Jabbour, A. Haevermans, T. Haevermans, R. Hernández, S.A. Little, S. Löfstrand, J.A. Luna, J. Massoni, S. Nadot, S. Pamperl, C. Prieu, E. Reyes, P. dos Santos, K.M. Schoonderwoerd, S. Sontag, A. Soulebeau, Y. Staedler, G.F. Tschan, A.W.-S. Leung, J. Schönenberger. 2017. The ancestral flower of angiosperms and its early diversification. Nature Communications 8: 16047. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms16047

Soltis, P.S., R.A. Folk, and D.E. Soltis. 2019. Darwin review: angiosperm phylogeny and evolutionary radiations. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, Biological Sciences 286: 20190099. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.0099

Sun, G., Q. Ji, D.L. Dilcher, S. Zheng, K.C. Nixon, and X. Wang. 2002. Archaefructaceae, a new basal angiosperm family. Science 296: 899–904. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1069439

* Swamy, B.G.L. 1949. Further contributions to the morphology of the Degeneriaceae. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 30: 10–38. Read/download free from Biodiversity Heritage Library: https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/part/185600#/summary

* Wang, W., D.L. Dilcher, H.-S. Wang, and Z.-D. Chen. 2014. Accelerated evolution of early angiosperms: Evidence from ranunculalean phylogeny by integrating living and fossil data. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 54: 336–341. https://doi.org/10.1111/jse.12090

Tschan, G.F., T. Denk, and M. von Balthazar. 2008. Credneria and Platanus (Plantanaceae) from the Late Cretaceous (Santonian) of Quedlinburg, Germany. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 152: 211–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2008.05.004

Wang, H., and D.L. Dilcher. 2018. A new species of Donlesia (Ceratophyllaceae) from the Early Cretaceous of Kansas, U.S.A. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 252: 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2018.02.002

* Yamada, T., and M. Kato. 2008. Stopesia alveolata, a fossil seed of Trimeniaceae from the Lower Cretaceous (Albian) of Hokkaido, northern Japan. Acta Phytotaxonomica et Geobotanica 59: 228–230. https://doi.org/10.18942/apg.KJ00005124838

* Yamada, T., H. Nishida, M. Umebayashi, K. Uemura, and M. Kato. 2008. Oldest record of Trimeniaceae from the Early Cretaceous of northern Japan. BMC Evolutionary Biology 8: article 135. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-8-135

Angiosperm phylogeny poster

Cole, T.C.H., H.H. Hilger, and P. Stevens. 2019. Angiosperm phylogeny poster (APP) – Flowering plant systematics, 2019. PeerJ Preprints 7: e2320v6.

Books & textbooks

Evert, R.F., and S.E. Eichhorn. 2013. Raven Biology of Plants, 8th ed. W.H. Freeman and Co., New York, New York. 

Friis, E.M., P.R. Crane, and K.R. Pedersen. 2011. Early Flowers and Angiosperm Evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.

Foster, A.S., and E.M. Gifford. 1974. Comparative Morphology of Vascular Plants, 2nd ed. W.H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco.

Simpson, M.G. 2010. Plant Systematics, 2nd ed. Academic Press, Burlington, Massachusetts.


B.R.S. 1995. Monocots versus dicots, the two classes of flowering plants. 1995. University of California Museum of Paleontology. https://ucmp.berkeley.edu/glossary/gloss8/monocotdicot.html

Soltis, P., D. Soltis, and C. Edwards. 2005. Angiosperms. Flowering Plants. ver. 03, 3 June 2005. In: The Tree of Life Web Project  (http://tolweb.org).  http://tolweb.org/Angiosperms/20646/2005.06.03

Soltis, P., D. Soltis, and C. Edwards. 2005. Magnoliids. ver. 23 June 2005. In: The Tree of Life Web Project. (http://tolweb.org). http://tolweb.org/magnoliids/20670

* Stevens, P.F. 2001 onwards. Angiosperms Phylogeny Website. http://www.mobot.org/MOBOT/research/APweb/welcome.html

Content usage

Usage of text and images created for DEAL: Text on this page was written by Elizabeth J. Hermsen. Original written content created by E.J. Hermsen for the Digital Encyclopedia of Ancient Life that appears on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Original images and diagrams created by E.J. Hermsen are also licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Content sourced from other websites: Attribution, source webpage, and licensing information or terms of use are indicated for images sourced from other websites in the figure caption below the relevant image. See original sources for further details. Attribution and source webpage are indicated for embedded videos. See original sources for terms of use. Reproduction of an image or video on this page does not imply endorsement by the author, creator, source website, publisher, and/or copyright holder. 

Adapted images. Images that have been adapted or remixed for DEAL (e.g., labelled images, multipanel figures) are governed by the terms of the original image license(s) covering attribution, general reuse, and commercial reuse. DEAL places no further restrictions above or beyond those of the original creator(s) and/or copyright holder(s) on adapted images, although we ask that you credit DEAL if reusing an adapted image from the DEAL website. Please note that some DEAL figures may only be reused with permission of the creator(s) or copyright holder(s) of the original images. Consult the individual image credits for further details.

Page first released 10 November 2019; last updated 12 June 2020.